AASK STOICSSOURCE LIBRARY · PRACTICE APP Open the App

Ask Stoics source guide · Stoic Distinctions

Feeling and Being Ruled by Passion

Stoic philosophy draws a clear line between the initial stirrings of emotion, often termed first movements, and the destructive grip of passion. While these initial feelings are a natural part of human experience, allowing them to gain authority over reason can lead to significant distress and irrational actions. The core of this distinction lies in recognizing these impulses and preventing them from escalating into full-blown passions that dictate our judgments and behaviors. This approach helps maintain a state of tranquility and rational control over one's inner life.

On this page you will get a clear explanation, a way to examine the idea, exact evidence from public-domain Stoic texts, and links for continuing the study.

The Nature of Passion

Passion, in the Stoic understanding, is more than just a strong feeling; it is a disturbance of the mind that has been granted authority over reason. Once admitted, it becomes exceedingly difficult to manage or dislodge.

When passion takes hold, it can override rational thought, leading to actions that are not aligned with virtue or sound judgment. It operates by its own will, not merely as much as you might allow it.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.8

The Danger of Admission

Allowing a passion to enter the mind is akin to letting an enemy into a city. Once inside and past its gates, it will not permit its prisoners to set limits to its victory.

The mind does not stand apart and view its passions from without, so as not to permit them to take hold. Once passion is admitted, it gains a certain authority by our own free will.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.8

Reason's Authority

Reason should never call upon blind and fierce impulses for aid, as she herself possesses no authority over them. Such impulses cannot be restrained save by setting against them similar and equally powerful passions.

To rely on passions like fear against anger, or greed against sloth, is to put virtues under the patronage of vices. This is a shameful state for the mind, as it cannot find safe repose there.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.10

The Illusion of Useful Passions

Some consider it best to control anger, not to banish it utterly, believing it can rouse the spirit and excite it, supplying courage for grand actions in war.

However, it is a mistake to think that virtue needs the aid of vices. The mind cannot find safe repose if it cannot be brave without anger, diligent without greed, or quiet without fear.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.7; Seneca, On Anger 1.10

Controlling vs. Banishing Passions

It is often argued that passions should be controlled rather than banished entirely, with the aim of retaining their useful aspects while cutting off their extravagances.

However, it is easier to banish dangerous passions than to rule them. It is simpler not to admit them at all than to try and keep them in order once they have gained entry.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.7

The First Incentives

The most effective strategy is to reject straightway the first incentives to anger, to resist its very beginnings, and to take care not to be betrayed into it.

If once a passion begins to carry us away, it is hard to get back again into a healthy condition, because reason goes for nothing when once passion has been admitted to the mind.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.8

What the primary texts say

These excerpts keep their work and exact locator so you can check the claim in context rather than accepting a detached quotation.

“The best plan is to reject straightway the first incentives to anger, to resist its very beginnings, and to take care not to be betrayed into it: for if once it begins to carry us away, it is hard to get back again into a healthy condition, because reason goes for nothing when once passion has been admitted to the”
— Seneca, On Anger 1.8 · Aubrey Stewart translation · Open the public-domain edition
“For this cause reason will never call to its aid blind and fierce impulses, over whom she herself possesses no authority, and which she never can restrain save by setting against them similar and equally powerful passions, as for example, fear against anger, anger against sloth, greed against timidity.”
— Seneca, On Anger 1.10 · Aubrey Stewart translation · Open the public-domain edition
“In the first place, it is easier to banish dangerous passions than to rule them; it is easier not to admit them than to keep them in order when…”
— Seneca, On Anger 1.7 · Aubrey Stewart translation · Open the public-domain edition

Frequently asked questions

What is the Stoic view on initial feelings?

Initial feelings are natural impulses, distinct from destructive passions. The Stoic approach focuses on preventing these first movements from escalating into judgments and actions that give passion control over reason.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.8

Why is it difficult to control a passion once it's admitted?

Once a passion is admitted to the mind, it gains authority by our own free will. Reason then loses its influence, and the passion will act as it chooses, not as we might wish to allow it.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.8

Can passions ever be useful, according to Stoicism?

Some ancient views suggested passions like anger could be useful for motivation. However, Stoic thought emphasizes that reason should not rely on such impulses, as they are uncontrollable and undermine virtue.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.7; Seneca, On Anger 1.10

What is the best strategy for dealing with passions?

The best strategy is to reject the very first incentives to passion. It is easier to prevent their entry than to try and manage them once they have taken hold of the mind.

Sources: Seneca, On Anger 1.8; Seneca, On Anger 1.7

Continue with Ask Stoics

Bring one of these source-grounded questions into the app:

  • How can I identify the 'first incentives' of a passion?
  • What practices can help me resist the initial stirrings of emotion?
  • How does giving a passion 'authority' manifest in daily life?
  • Can you give an example of how reason might mistakenly call on a passion for aid?
Open the App